2017 Graduation Speech to UNC Department of Statistics and Operations Research

Text as prepared.

YOU LOOK GREAT. A SEA OF BLUE. 20 YEARS AGO I WAS ONE OF THOSE DROPLETS IN THE SEA OF BLUE.

I’M HONORED TO BE SPEAKING WITH YOU HERE TODAY. BUT I’M NOT HONORED SO MUCH AS I AM SURPRISED. BECAUSE THE DATA 20 YEARS AGO WOULD NEVER HAVE MODELED A SCENARIO IN WHICH I WOULD BE SPEAKING AT GRADUATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH.

Shannon Paylor and Ryan Thornburg
2017 STOR graduate and Carolina Data Desk fellow Shannon Paylor with me at the department’s graduation.

I WAS A WORDS GUY WHO IN COLLEGE TOOK ABSOLUTELY AS LITTLE MATH AS POSSIBLE. THE ONE QUANTITATIVE COURSE I DID TAKE IN COLLEGE WAS A STATISTICS CLASS. PROFESSOR LEDBETTER — WHO IS RETIRING THIS YEAR — WAS THE INSTRUCTOR, AND IT HAS THE HONOR OF BEING THE LOWEST GRADE ON MY PARTICULARLY UNREMARKABLE TRANSCRIPT.

IF 2017 RYAN HAD GIVEN A GRADUATION SPEECH TO 1997 RYAN, WHAT HE MIGHT HAVE TOLD HIM WAS THAT AT THIS MOMENT IN YOUR LIFE, ALL THE POSSIBLE FUTURES THAT YOU’VE IMAGINED FOR YOURSELF — AND EVEN THOSE YOU CAN’T IMAGINE — HAVE A PROBABILITY GREATER THAN 0 BUT LESS THAN 1. AND AT THIS POINT, YOU STILL DON’T YET HAVE ENOUGH DATA TO BUILD A GOOD MODEL FOR WHAT LIFE HAS IN STORE FOR YOU. AND THAT DATA, WHILE GOOD AT TELLING US WHAT HAS BEEN, AND WHAT IS, AND WHAT MIGHT BE — IS NOT AS POWERFUL AS STORIES TO HELP US IMAGINE THE LIFE WE WANT AND TO HELP US MOVE THE ODDS OF GETTING THERE CLOSER TO 1.

DURING MY 20-YEAR CAREER IN JOURNALISM, DATA HAS BECOME A POWERFUL TOOL FOR FINDING STORIES THAT WE MIGHT MISS IF WE RELIED ON INTERVIEWS AND OBSERVATION ALONE. AS JOURNALISTS WORK TO SHINE LIGHT IN DARK PLACES, HOLD POWERFUL PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE AND EXPLAIN THE INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD WE ALL SHARE, DATA HELPS US DEVELOP THE WHO, WHAT, WHEN AND WHERE OF OUR STORIES. BUT DATA ALONE CAN’T TELL US “WHY?” OR “SO WHAT?” UNTIL WE ADD SOME PLOT TO THE STORY, DATA IS JUST A COLD FOSSIL.

SEE, TO HAVE A GOOD STORY, YOU HAVE TO RICH MOMENTS. LIKE THIS MOMENT THAT WE’RE ALL SHARING NOW. IT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT OF YOUR CAROLINA STORY, NOT BECAUSE WHAT I’M SAYING RIGHT NOW WILL BE PARTICULARLY MEMORABLE FOR YOU IN 20 YEARS. THIS MOMENT IS POWERFUL BECAUSE IT’S ONE TO WHICH YOU’VE ALREADY BEEN DOZENS OF TIMES IN YOUR IMAGINATION. THIS MOMENT — NOT AS IT ACTUALLY EXISTS, BUT AS IT EXISTED IN THE STORIES YOU TOLD YOURSELVES ABOUT IT — PROPELLED YOU THROUGH HARD TIMES OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS, TIMES WHEN THE DATA MIGHT HAVE TOLD YOU YOU WOULDN’T MAKE IT.

DATA CAN TELL US A LOT OF IMPORTANT ATTRIBUTES OF THIS MOMENT. I CAN TELL YOU HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE SITTING HERE. AND, IN FACT, I CAN TELL YOU THAT YOUR NAME IS MORE LIKELY TO BE EMILY OR MATTHEW THAN ANYTHING ELSE. AND WITH ENOUGH DATA, I MIGHT EVEN BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND HOW EACH OF YOU GOT HERE. BUT WHAT I CAN’T TELL YOU — AND WHAT NO DATA CAN TELL YOU — IS WHY YOU ARE HERE.

THE DAY IS NOT FAR OFF WHERE WE COULD GATHER ENOUGH DATA ABOUT THIS MOMENT TO RECREATE IT IN VIRTUAL REALITY WITH PRETTY HIGH FIDELITY. IN FACT, COLLABORATIONS AMONG JOURNALISM, STATISTICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE RIGHT HERE AT UNC WILL MAKE THAT DAY ARRIVE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.

BUT WHILE DATA MIGHT ONE DAY BE USED TO RECREATE MOMENTS, IT CAN’T TELL STORIES. BECAUSE STORIES ARE RICH MOMENTS THAT ARE STRUNG TOGETHER WITH MEANING. STORIES NEED THE WHO, WHAT, WHEN AND WHERE OF DATA. BUT THEY AREN’T STORIES UNTIL THEY ANSWER THE QUESTION “WHY?”

SO, WHY ARE YOU HERE? WHAT’S YOUR STORY?

YOU SEE, FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, THE UNIVERSITY — THEY ALL HAVE DATA ABOUT YOU. BUT YOU YOURSELVES ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO GIVE THAT DATA MEANING, AND YOU GIVE IT MEANING BY TELLING YOURSELVES AND THE REST OF THE WORLD STORIES. AND IT’S THOSE STORIES THAT PROVIDE THE MORAL PROPULSION TO CHANGE THE DATA ITSELF.

SO, WHY ARE YOU HERE?

NOW, IF I COULD HAVE SUCKED UP ALL YOUR ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION WHY ARE YOU HERE AND RUN THEM THROUGH SOME NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING APPLICATION I MIGHT BE ABLE TO REDUCE ALL OF THAT DATA TO A SINGLE, MEAN ANSWER: YOU’RE HERE BECAUSE YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE DEGREE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL IN 2017.

THAT’S THE COMMON REASON WE ARE ALL HERE. BUT WHAT’S THE REASON ANY ONE OF YOU ARE HERE. WHY ARE YOU HERE?

SO WHILE YOU’RE ALL MEDITATING ON THAT QUESTION, I’M GOING TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE WHO GOT YOU HERE — YOUR FRIENDS, YOUR FAMILIES, AND THE MILLIONS OF NORTH CAROLINIANS WHO WORK HOURLY WAGE JOBS AND PAY THEIR TAXES BECAUSE THEY SEE YOU AND YOUR PURSUIT OF THIS DEGREE AS A WORTHY INVESTMENT.

TO THOSE OF YOU WHO CONTRIBUTED SO MUCH TO THESE STUDENTS’ SUCCESS, WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU ARE BUDDING PROFESSIONALS IN SOME OF THE HIGHEST PAID AND FASTEST GROWING FIELDS. IN THE U.S. ALONE, THERE ARE ABOUT 100,000 JOBS FOR STATISTICIANS, AND IN 2024 THERE WILL BE ANOTHER 30,000. THE MEDIAN SALARY FOR THESE FIELDS IS ABOUT DOUBLE THE MEDIAN SALARY FOR A NEWS REPORTER. ACCORDING TO MY FORMER EMPLOYER, USNEWS, THE JOB OF STATISTICIAN IS THE FOURTH “BEST” JOB IN AMERICA. OR, ANOTHER WAY OF LOOKING AT IT, IT’S THE TOP JOB WHERE YOU DON’T HAVE TO DEAL WITH OTHER PEOPLE’S BLOOD.

AS THIS DEPARTMENT’S WEBSITE WILL TELL YOU, THE GRADUATES SITTING HERE ARE WELL QUALIFIED TO “TACKLE CHALLENGING QUANTITATIVE PROBLEMS IN A BUSINESS OR SCIENTIFIC ENVIRONMENTS.” THEY WILL GO ON TO CAREERS IN GENOMICS; BIOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS; INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS; REVENUE, WORKFORCE, AND SUPPLY-CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC FLOW AND CONGESTION; AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS.

BUT REGARDLESS OF THE FIELD, A BIG PART OF MANY OF THEIR JOBS WILL BE ASSESSING RISK AND UNCERTAINTY.

GRADUATES, YOU ARE EMBARKING ON CAREERS IN WHICH YOUR WILL BE ASKED TO REDUCE RISK AND UNCERTAINTY JUST AT THE MOMENT THE WORLD SEEMS TO PREFER EXACTLY THOSE THINGS.

AS JOURNALISTS WHO TRIED TO PREDICT THE OUTCOME OF LAST YEAR’S ELECTION CAN TELL YOU, OLD MODELS ARE SUDDENLY INSUFFICIENT. AND IT’S NOT JUST IN POLITICS WHERE THE WORLD SEEMS ON UNCERTAIN FOOTING. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IS ACCELERATING AND BECOMING MORE ERRATIC. MODELS OF MILITARY POWER AND THE VERY RELEVANCE OF NATIONS ARE UP FOR DEBATE. AND CLOSER TO HOME, THE PATH TO ADULTHOOD AND ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE IS VEERING OF A COURSE THAT IT’S BEEN ON FOR GENERATIONS.

WHEN MANY OF YOU WERE IN KINDERGARTEN, MEN TRAINED AND FINANCED BY THE AL QAEDA TERRORIST ORGANIZATION DESTROYED THE NEW YORK WORLD TRADE CENTER AND BADLY DAMAGED THE PENTAGON. THAT WAS A MOMENT OF GREAT UNCERTAINTY THAT IS RICH IN DATA, BUT IT’S THE STORIES THAT WE TELL OURSELVES ABOUT THAT MOMENT THAT GIVE IT SUCH MEANING THAT THE NUMBERS 9 AND 11 CAN NO LONGER STAND FOR ANYTHING ELSE.

WHEN YOU WERE IN MIDDLE SCHOOL, A COLLAPSE IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY CAUSED JOBS LOST AND DREAMS DEFERRED TO BE PROMINENT TOPICS IN EITHER YOUR OWN HOUSE OR YOUR FRIENDS’ FAMILIES. THOSE MOMENTS ARE PART OF YOUR LIFE STORY JUST LIKE TODAY IS.

UNCERTAINTY SEEMS TO BE EVERYWHERE THESE DAYS. FOR MANY PEOPLE, THE INSTINCT IS TO CLING TO SECURITY AS IF THE SONG IS ABOUT TO STOP IN A GAME OF MUSICAL CHAIRS. OTHERS SEE IN UNCERTAINTY A CHANCE TO SOW DOUBT AND UNDERMINE EVIDENCE.

FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE, UNCERTAINTY IS A SYNONYM FOR FEAR AND AN EXCUSE FOR CYNICISM. AND THOSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO ASK PEOPLE WITH YOUR SKILLS, GRADUATES, TO TELL THEM HOW TO PROFIT FROM FEAR AND HOW THEY SHOULD HEDGE THEIR BETS SO THAT WHEN THE SHUFFLE IS DONE THEIR CARD IS ON TOP.

LIKE JOURNALISTS, YOUR JOBS WILL BE TO SORT OUT THE SIGNAL FROM THE NOISE AND TURN DATA POINTS INTO ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE. AND ALSO LIKE JOURNALISTS, YOUR CHALLENGE IS CHOOSING WHICH SOURCES TO TRUST, WHICH BITS OF INFORMATION ARE RELEVANT, AND THEN HOW TO COMMUNICATE INHERENTLY UNCERTAIN FINDINGS SO THAT THEY CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BY PEOPLE WHO DON’T HAVE YOUR ANALYTICAL EXPERTISE.

THE CHALLENGE OF TACKLING THESE QUANTITATIVE PROBLEMS DOESN’T EXIST JUST IN BUSINESS AND SCIENTIFIC ENVIRONMENTS. THE REASON YOUR SKILLS ARE SO VALUABLE IS BECAUSE THE WORLD TODAY IS RICH WITH DATA BUT POOR IN OUR ABILITY TO MAKE SENSE OF IT.

THE NEWSROOM IS JUST ONE PLACE THAT IS WAKING UP TO THE VALUE OF YOUR SKILLS. ADVERTISERS, LEGISLATORS; TERRORISTS, TRUCKERS, AND TAXI DRIVERS; POLICE AND POLITICAL DISSIDENTS ALL WANT YOUR SKILLS. YOUR GENERATION OF STATISTICIANS AND DATA SCIENTISTS WILL HAVE INCREDIBLE PROFESSIONAL OPPORTUNITY, AND THE STORY YOU TELL YOURSELF ABOUT WHY YOU ARE HERE TODAY WILL HELP DETERMINE WHETHER HUMANITY USES DATA TO EMPOWER OR ENSLAVE ITSELF.

DATA-DRIVEN AUTOMATION IS ABOUT TO UPEND THE GLOBAL WORKFORCE. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE FIELD OF JOURNALISM, DURHAM COMPANY AUTOMATED INSIGHTS TURNS DATA INTO ARTICLES FOR THE ASSOCIATED PRESS.

THIS KIND OF AUTOMATION IS EXCITING. BUT WILL WE BECOME SO ENTRANCED BY AUTOMATING THE DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IS THAT WE FORGET THAT DATA CANNOT TELL US INEVITABLY WHAT WILL BE? THAT’S LEFT UP TO US. WE CAN’T FORGET THAT EVERY FUTURE IS POSSIBLE, AND THAT IF WE HAVE CURIOSITY, IMAGINATION AND PERSEVERANCE WE CAN TIP THAT NEEDLE IN THE DIRECTION WE WANT.

NOW WE KNOW THAT ALL THE CURIOSITY, IMAGINATION AND PERSEVERANCE IN THE WORLD DOESN’T ALWAYS GET US WHAT WE WANT. THE STORIES OF OUR LIVES ARE NOT WORKS OF FICTION OF WHICH WE ARE THE OMNIPOTENT AUTHORS. OUR STORIES COLLIDE WITH THE STORIES OF OTHERS, AND VERY OFTEN THE STORY THE REST OF THE WORLD SEEMS TO BE WRITING FOR US DOES NOT MATCH OUR PLOT AT ALL. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PUT ANY EFFORT INTO CREATING THE FUTURE YOU WANT FOR YOURSELF, THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PUTTING EFFORT INTO CREATING A FUTURE YOU DON’T WANT.

IF THERE ARE 200 PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM, THEN THERE ARE 200 UNIQUE STORIES ABOUT WHY EACH OF US ARE HERE. PART OF THE REASON THAT GRADUATION IS SO POWERFUL IS THAT IT’S A MOMENT IN WHICH ALL OF THOSE INDIVIDUAL STORIES WEAVE TOGETHER IN A HELIX THAT FOR 224 YEARS HAS CREATED A CULTURE ON THIS CAMPUS THAT STRIVES FOR THE MOTTO YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE ON YOUR DIPLOMAS — LUX LIBERTAS — LIGHT AND LIBERTY.

AND NOW IT’S TIME FOR US TO GIVE YOU THOSE PAPERS AND TURN THE PAGE FROM THIS CHAPTER IN YOUR STORY TO THE NEXT.

YOU HAVE BEEN A PART OF THE LONG, IMPROBABLE STORY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL ITSELF. TIME HERE MARCHES ON, PEOPLE HERE MARCH ON, BUT THE PLOT OF OUR SHARED STORY — TO BRING LIGHT AND LIBERTY TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE AND THE WORLD — REMAINS THE SAME.

YOU’VE WALKED THIS UNIVERSITY’S BRICK PATHS FOR THE LAST TIME AS STUDENTS, BUT AS YOU SET OFF INTO A WORLD OF UNCERTAINTY, THE CHOICES YOU MAKE IN YOUR UNIQUE PURSUIT OF YOUR UNIQUE STORIES BECOME THE GUIDING LIGHTS THAT FUTURE GENERATIONS WILL USE TO WALK THESE SAME BRICK PATHS.

YOUR CHOICES ON HOW TO APPLY THE POWERFUL SKILLS YOU LEARNED HERE AT UNC BECOME DATAPOINTS THAT STUDENTS 20 YEARS FROM NOW WILL USE TO BUILD THEIR MODEL OF THE CAROLINA WAY AND ALL THE POSSIBLE FUTURES IT MIGHT HAVE.

PARENTS, FAMILIES AND FRIENDS, THANK YOU FOR ENTRUSTING THESE STUDENTS YOU LOVE TO UNC. FACULTY, THANK YOU FOR PREPARING THESE STUDENTS TO BE LEADERS IN EVERY VOCATION AND AVOCATION. AND STUDENTS — GRADUATES — THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU’VE ADDED TO THE STORY OF UNC AND EVERYTHING YOU WILL CONTINUE TO ADD. I LOOK FORWARD TO LISTENING TO ONE OF YOU GIVE THE GRADUATION SPEECH AT THE JOURNALISM SCHOOL IN 2037.

Email Newsletter Success Metrics

Updated: Jan. 8, 2015, 11:21 a.m.

One byproduct of all the recent articles about the growth of email newsletter that aim to “cut through the daily clutter” is an amazing amount of clutter about email newsletters. Here’s what you need to know today.

    • The Skimm was started by two NBC News producers in their 20s. It’s been around for two years. It goes out at 6 a.m. They have $1.1 million and 7 employees. They don’t talk about their subscriber numbers. Their blog is a fantastic read on media entrepreneurship, and we should hand it out to incoming freshmen at Chapel Hill. (https://blog.theskimm.com/)
    • Quartz’s Daily Brief also goes out at 6 a.m. There are three global versions, and users “click a lot on the links to opinion pieces and ‘random discoveries’ that we include in the second half of the email.” (httpss://blog.mailchimp.com/quartzs-email-centric-news-coverage/)
    • The Quartz email in June had 77,000 subscribers (62 percent of its Twitter followers). It has a 50-percent open rate. It “makes money.” (https://www.themediabriefing.com/article/quartz-newsletters-advice-simon-davies-daily-brief)
    • Time’s email newsletter has 650,000 subscribers. The curated daily list of 12 stories every morning has a 40 percent open rate, that it says is twice the industry average. That’s up from a 17 percent open rate when it was auto-generated headlines. (https://www.poynter.org/news/media-innovation/277009/how-times-email-newsletter-achieves-a-40-percent-open-rate/)
    • The daily newsletter about data — called Up, Down, All Around — from Lindsey Rogers Cook of U.S. News has subscribers “in the low hundreds” and open rates around 40 percent. (httpss://twitter.com/Lindzcook/status/553225591168966656)
    • Alexis Mardrigal’s email newsletter has a 60 percent open rate. (https://www.fastcompany.com/3033338/most-creative-people/tips-on-crafting-a-popular-newsletter-from-top-newsletter-authors)
    • Nieman Labs email newsletter (in March 2013) had 10,000 subscribers and drove 3 percent of monthly pageviews. If what I’ve seen elsewhere holds true, each visit from an email newsletter is worth about 3x as many page views as from social media. (https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/03/texas-tribune-expands-its-niche-email-business-with-in-the-flow/)
    • At Buzzfeed, email ranks behind Pinterest in the amount of traffic it generates for the site. (https://www.poynter.org/news/mediawire/280943/how-newsletters-became-one-of-buzzfeeds-top-sources-of-traffic/)
    • The number of subscribers to Nieman Lab’s email newsletter is 10 percent of the number of Twitter followers it has. (https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/06/convert-your-twitter-followers-to-email-subscribers-with-a-twitter-lead-generation-card/)
    • Alexis Madrigal’s email newsletter had 8,800 subscribers in July. That’s about 5 percent of his Twitter followers. (https://www.fastcompany.com/3033338/most-creative-people/tips-on-crafting-a-popular-newsletter-from-top-newsletter-authors)
    • 75% of Digg’s users say they use email to share links in April 2013. It was more popular than any other service they used to share links. (https://blog.digg.com/post/49264812779/were-still-learning)

  • Today in Tabs grew from 1,000 subscribers in January 2014 to 10,000 in January 2015. (https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/01/how-a-free-email-newsletter-turned-a-computer-programmer-into-a-newsweek-columnist/ and httpss://twitter.com/rustyk5/status/553224153978142720)
  • In June, Nieman Lab used a Twitter card to solicit subscriptions to the newsletter. It went out to 157,000 followers and yielded 370 new subscribers. (https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/06/convert-your-twitter-followers-to-email-subscribers-with-a-twitter-lead-generation-card/)
  • “The Arizona Daily Star’s site saw a 30 percent increase in email newsletter signups January through February. (https://www.poynter.org/news/media-innovation/138054/5-ways-to-turn-traffic-spikes-from-major-news-stories-into-return-visits/)
  • The Slurve is a daily newsletter about baseball. It costs $4 a month or $36 a year. It goes out about 10 a.m., and has about 150 links and 2,700 words. (https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/09/a-solo-home-run-the-slurve-is-trying-to-build-an-authentic-profitable-business-around-email/)

 

Ben Bradlee interview from 2005

I was lucky enough to be working at The Washington Post in 2005 when the identity of Deep Throat was revealed. I remembered at the time thinking what a relief it was for The Post to finally have it out there — now we could focus on the future.

But 10 years later I find myself doing something I once criticized journalism students for doing — being nostalgic for something I never really knew. If given the choice between working at Facebook in 2015 and The Washington Post in 1975, I’d choose the later.

At the same time, if the choice were between Facebook 2015 and The Washington Post 2015, I’d probably go for Facebook.

The future of journalism is forcing us to think about technology and economics, which is not just healthy but exciting. But those topics can dull our sense for holding powerful people accountable, shining light in dark places and explaining an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

Here’s my interview with Ben Bradlee from 2005.

Correct Audience Numbers for The Columbia Tribune

I made an error in the piece I wrote for PBS Media Shift Idea Lab yesterday. I misrepresented the audience for The Columbia Tribune. The paper’s general manager, Andy Waters, kindly brought it to my attention and I want to offer a correction here.

Numbers that Waters sent me from The Media Audit show that the news organization reaches nearly 80 percent of the 130,000 adults in its market. I used a small potential audience base and a smaller penetration rate when I wrote up the post. That number was no good and I should’ve known better than to use it. I simply took the print circulation and divided it by the Census estimate of residents in Columbia.

You could go all night quibbling about audience measurement methodologies, but whatever faults The Media Audit numbers may or may not have, they are certainly better than the way I tried to calculate it.

And I think this is a particularly important measurement to correct because of the number of unsourced posts that you can find on the Internet saying that the Tribune lost anywhere between 25 and 40 percent of its online audience when it implemented online subscriptions. I’m not fact-checking those claims one way or the other, and even if true they may not be important. I’m repeating it here only to provide context for the correction and to hopefully spur some critical thinking about any audience claims you see — including mine.

Anyway. The Media Audit numbers that Waters showed me indicate that out of a base population of 130,634 adults 18 or older, 103,260 of them – or 79 percent – say they read the Tribune either in print or online. The print edition (weekday/Sunday) reaches 62 percent of the market at least once a week, and the website reaches 52.5 percent of the market at least once a month.

I hope that gives a better picture of the kind of environment in which the Tribune’s OpenBlock experiment is taking place. And the point I was trying to make I think remains valid — that Columbia, Mo., is WAY different than Chicago or Charlotte or San Francisco.

How it’s going to go down tonight. Maybe.

7p –
Romney: 44 (Ga., S.C., Ky., Ind.)
Obama: 3 (Vt.)
Undeclared: 34 (Va., Fla.)

Virginia and Florida will be our first undecided states, and in 2008 they were the ones that finally got called at 11 p.m. and allowed TV networks to project that Obama would win.

7:30 –
Romney: 49 (W.Va.)
Obama: 3 (Vt.)
Undeclared: 43 (N.C., Ohio, Va., Fla.)

In 2008, McCain conceded even while he was still ahead in North Carolina. Of course, after all precincts reported it was Obama who won became the first Democrat since Jimmy Carter to win the state. It will be at least 9:30 before the state is called and I suspect that the longer it stays open the worse it looks for Romney.

West Virginia hasn’t gone Democratic since 1996. Sometimes I forget that.

8 p.m. –
Romney: 130 (Tenn., Ala., Miss., Mo., Tex., Okla.)
Obama: 98 (Mich., Maine, N.H., R.I., Conn., N.J., Del., Md., D.C., Ill.)
Undeclared: 59 (N.C., Ohio, Va., Fla.)

If N.H. and Mich. don’t go for Obama right away, then he may be in trouble there.
If N.J. doesn’t get called right away, it’ll probably not be an indication of anything other than storm-related voting issues.

8:30 p.m. –
Romney: 136 (Ark.)
Obama: 98 ()
Undeclared: 59 (N.C., Ohio, Va., Fla.)

9 p.m. –
Romney: 174 (La., N.D., S.D., Neb., Kans., Wyo., Ariz.)
Obama: 152 (N.Y., Minn., N.M., Wis.)
Undeclared: 68 (Colo., N.C., Ohio, Va., Fla.)

Colorado is another of those states that didn’t get called in 2008 until after McCain conceded shortly after 11 p.m.

In 2008 at about 9:30 p.m., the networks projected Obama would win Ohio. They also projected Wisconsin going for Obama about the same time. It looks like they both may go Obama’s way this year, too – but Wisconsin before Ohio.

10 p.m. –
Romney: 185 (Mont., Utah)
Obama: 164 (Nev., Iowa)
Undeclared: 68 (Colo., N.C., Ohio, Va., Fla.)

Iowa went for Obama right away in 2008. And he eventually got 54 percent of the vote there. If the state goes to Romney, it would be the second time since 1988. A slow call for Obama here might point in that direction.

I seem to recall that Nevada is very slow to report, but a slow call in Nevada might also be an indication that the state will return to the Republican column.

In 2008 at about 10:45 p.m., Fox called Virginia for Obama.

11 p.m. –
Romney: 185 ()
Obama: 269 (Ohio, Va., Calif., Wash., Ore.)
Undeclared: 50 (Colo., N.C., Fla.)

Hope will remain for Romney if Ohio doesn’t go to Obama by 11 p.m. But also note that Ohio is expecting more than 200,000 provisional ballots, and will be forced into a recount if the difference between the two candidates is about 14,000 votes.

Of the five remaining undeclared states, Nate Silver predicts that Obama is most likely to win Virginia and Colorado. But winning Virginia would still leave Obama one electoral vote shy of the 270 he needs to win the presidency. So expect this election night to go later than it did four years ago.

Florida and Virginia got called for Obama shortly after 11 p.m. in 2008, allowing networks to project him as the winner. Obama had about 53 percent in Virginia and 51 percent in Florida when all the votes were counted in 2008.

Nevada didn’t get declared until after McCain conceded. Obama ended up with 55 percent of the vote there.

12 a.m. –
Romney: 185 ()
Obama: 273 (Hawaii)
Undeclared: 37 (Colo., N.C., Va., Fla.)

1 a.m. –
Romney: 188 (Alaska)
Obama: 273 ()
Undeclared: 37 (Colo., N.C., Va., Fla.)

Thanks to:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/11/02/us/politics/paths-to-the-white-house.html

https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

https://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82595.html

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map.html

https://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-4571254.html

How to subscribe on Facebook? What does Acquaintance mean?

In other words, what’s the difference between “Unsubscribing” from one of your friends on Facebook or adding them to your Acquaintance list?

Subscribing to someone is a way of seeing their Facebook updates in your News Feed without being friends with the person.

While you don’t have to be friends with someone to subscribe to them, you do automatically become subscribed when you become friends.

Once you are subscribed, you further limit what you see from someone by mousing over one of their content items that appears in your News Feed and selecting the down arrow that appears on the upper right of the post. You can choose to see “All Updates” or “Most Updates” or “Only Important”. The default is “Most Updates”.

Facebook’s algorithm determines the precise meanings of each of those terms. “The news feed algorithm uses several factors, including: how many friends are commenting on a certain piece of content, who posted the content, and what type of content it is (e.g. photo, video, or status update),” according to Facebook.

Adding someone to your Acquaintance list automatically changes the subscription setting for that person to “Only Important.”

Selecting “Only Important” does not automatically add a friend to your Acquaintance list.

Acquaintance lists can also be used to manage which of your posts are seen by the members of that list. When you post a piece of content on Facebook, you can choose to share it with “Friends except Acquaintances”.

Facebook says that “people on your Acquaintances list will rarely show up in your news feed,” so it would seem to me.

Installing Python: Quick Tutorial for Journalism Students

Right off the bat, you’re going to learn that your ability to troubleshoot ambiguous instructions and consider all relevant variables will be key to your success as a computational journalist. Getting started with Python depends on which operating system you are using.

Python on a Mac

The easiest operating system on which to start is Apple’s OS X, which is install on all Macintosh computers. Every version of OS X ships with a default version of Python already installed. The “Lion” version of OS X — versions that begin with 10.7 — ship with Python 2.7.1 or (I think) 2.7.3. That’s great, because 2.7.3 is one of the most recent versions of Python, and the version we’ll be using here. (I’ll tell you in a bit why I say that 2.7.3 is one of the most recent versions.)

Earlier versions of OS X — such as 10.6 “Snow Leopard” — come with earlier versions of Python, such as 2.6.1 or something like that. For now at least, that’s no big prob.

Here’s how you can find out which version of Python is installed on your Macintosh:

  1. Go to Applications –> Utilities –> Terminal
  2. At the $ prompt, type “python –version”, and hit the [Return] key
  3. You should get a response that tells you what version of Python you have installed by default. Go ahead and get Python started by typing at the $ prompt: “python,” and then hitting the [Return] key

Python on Windows

Python does not come with Windows computers, so you will have to download and install it. Here’s how:

  1. Open a browser and go to https://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.3/python-2.7.3.msi . This will begin downloading the Python installer. It should take about 2 minutes to download.
  2. Once downloaded, double-click the installer to run it. It will take another 2 minutes to install.
  3. Unless there’s some reason not to, leave all the default choices selected.
  4. Python will be installed at C:Python27 and it will take up about 51MB of space. In your Start menu you will also see “IDLE (Python GUI)”. Let’s go ahead and launch Python now by clicking on that icon.

Python on Linux/Ubuntu/Amazon AWS

Many hard-core programmers work on some flavor of the free Linux operating system. Ubuntu is the version I use. You can install Ubuntu as an alternate operating system on either a Mac or a Windows PC. On my Mac, I use the freely available Virtual Box application from Oracle to create what’s called a virtual machine that allows me to run Ubuntu in RAM while I’m also working in the OS X operating system. But you can also install Ubuntu on your Mac using Apple’s own Boot Camp application (which you can find in Utilities) or a program called Parallels. I will say that Virtual Box is not particularly user friendly, and Boot Camp might be your best bet.

You can also install Ubuntu as an alternate operating on a Windows computer by using the instructions at https://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/install-ubuntu-with-windows

Finally, at some point you will want to put the applications you write in Python on the Web. To do that, you’ll need access to a Web server. Probably the easiest and cheapest place to start is the EC2 service from Amazon Web services, by going to https://aws.amazon.com. The upside of using AWS is that you can launch within minutes a Web server running the most recent version of Ubuntu and Python, and the cost is $1-$15 per month unless you do some heavy work. The downside is that security configuration that allows you to connect to create Python programs by using the “command line” — the Terminal on a Mac or on a Windows PC — can be a bit hairy. But you’ll have to learn how to do it eventually so now might as well be the time.

Troubleshooting

By now you should have a version of Python up and running on either a Mac, a PC or on a remote service like Amazon EC2. Or… you might have run into trouble. Most trouble you encounter is going to be because you’re reading instructions that differ, in some small way, from the operating system you’re using or the version of Python you’re using, or a thousand other small things. When you’re Googling for tutorials or forums on Linux, be sure you know the numerical version of your operating system and your version of Python. But even that may not be enough, because many authors have written their tutorials using outdated versions or they aren’t clear about which versions they’re using. Get used it. Be skeptical. Go slowly. Be calm.

Two potential errors I want to check with you right now:

  1. Don’t use any flavor of Python 3. Use only Python 2. Right now there are two “branches” of Python, and all of the applications we’re using will require Python 2. In this case, bigger is not better.
  2. On a Mac — and Ubuntu to some degree — be careful when you feel a temptation to “upgrade” to a new version of Python. Python comes with Macs for a reason — the operating system needs it to be a certain version in a certain location. Change it and things can get messed up beyond my ability to explain it. The built-in version of Python on a Mac will be at /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework and /usr/bin/python. If you install a different version, it — in an ideal world — will be at /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework. You should be able to use the command line in Terminal to navigate to those directories, and if you don’t know how to do that now is the time to ask a human for help. Your likelihood of finding the answer via Google will be inefficient at beast and frustrating at worst.



 

The 7 Key Presentation Elements of a News Story

I’ve been looking over a lot of news stories lately — as an award judge, as a grant recipient and a journalism professor — and I’m realizing there are a few items I want to see on every story. I may be unique in this. But, boy, gimme these and I’m a happy judge/editor/professor/reader:

1. A lead. The who, what, when where at minimum. Add the how and why if needed. One paragraph. No anecdotes.

2. Links from every relevant proper noun to a very brief reference card about the person or organization.

3. A timeline. How’d we get here? Where are we going?

4. A map.

5.  An FAQ. 

6. A search form. Backed by a relevant database.

7. A hosted, asynchronous discussion. It doesn’t matter whether it’s Twitter, Facebook or article comments. Just make sure it’s truly hosted by a knowledgeable human being adept at using conversation to clarify and verify rather than merely amplify assertion.

Now, I know from watching site metrics and studying award patterns that these aren’t the seven elements that most people prefer. Maybe four.

1. A number — or the words “How to…” — in the headline.

2. Breaking News. Often of relatively small increment.

3. Photos.

4. Something to click.

 

How about you? What presentation elements do you find yourself seeking out? Are there elements you see showing up repeatedly in award-winning pieces or audience favorites?

Top 10 Best Things About David Broder

The future of news looks less bright today with the death of David Broder, one of the best journalists of the 20th century. I had the change to work with him at The Washington Post, and all I can think about today is how much I’d enjoy replaying the last 50 years of his life, the last 10 of mine and putting us at the same news organization again.

Here are the Top 10 Best Things that the students in my journalism classes need to know about Mr. Broder.

10. Be a reporter first and an analyst second. Long after Mr. Broder was a television talking head, a syndicated columnist and a Pulitzer Prize winner, he knocked on the doors of voters in the Ohio River Valley.

9. Respect democracy. Mr. Broder believed in the value of public service and respected the sacrifice of candidates and elected representatives. I saw him treat the most influential members of both parties as human beings rather than targets, even as he probed them with smart, aggressive questions. I suspect the esteem in which he held public service allowed him to have high expectations that required tough questions.

8. Do not be driven by the “scoop.” By the time I had the chance to meet Mr. Broder, political journalism was already on its way to being driven mostly by the ability to deliver small details before your competitors could put together a cogent narrative. But even then, he cared more about being able to explain the story than break it.

7. Write plainly. Mr. Broder’s columns, news stories and books are a pleasure to read for their precision and economy of words. His prose seemed to be designed to make people feel smarter than they really were rather than dumber.

6. Work hard. I suspect that if given the choice between a deadline and party, Mr. Broder would choose the deadline every time.

5. Clean up your office. Seriously. Mr. Broder’s was a death trap. The La Brea Tar Pits of political reporting. Nobody’s perfect, after all.

4. Try new things. Mr. Broder was doing live online discussions with washingtonpost.com readers in 1998. What’s your excuse?

3. Have a sense of humor about yourself. During one of those early online discussions, the website’s political editor sent him an email of thanks and encouragement. Mr. Broder’s response is one I hope to get made into a t-shirt one day: “Did I do something bad on the Internet?”

2. Be an optimist in a world of cynics and naysayers. Mr. Broder cheered for the Cubs. He never tried to convince anyone that the world was worse than it is, and nor did he try to convince them it was better.

1. Take the kids to lunch. When I’m 81, inshallah, I’ll still remember the lunch I had with Mr. Broder. Just he and I. He had lunch with me not because he wanted anything from me. Not because he owed me anything. But because I asked for his time and he was kind enough to offer it. It was sometime around the 2004 election and we talked about his 1981 book, The Changing of the Guard. I had been wondering what the book would look like if it were a series on washingtonpost.com about yet another generation of political advisers and candidates. We talked about how it could be interactive and multimedia. He let me ask questions and make statements that alternated between naive and presumptuous. But he never checked his Blackberry, never looked around the room and never interrupted.

Mr. Broder had so many wonderful characteristics that I try to emulate. Being a great journalists is just one, and far from the most important. He was a great journalist because he was so much more. And I hope that the future of journalism can yield many more in his mold.